For the past year I've been teaching a freshman writing seminar called "Capes & Capers: the Antihero in American Literature and Film." When I began preparing the course, one of the first antiheroic character I thought of was Batman, and, inevitably, Batman Begins, since that was the first film to truly capture his dark side. Plus, it lacked Bat Nipples and neon lights, which I appreciated.I've found Batman Begins to be a great film for freshmen. Many of the things that critics had a problem with (the endless repetition of the word "fear," for example) are useful in the classroom. The movie really spells out most of its themes: duality, fear, darkness, justice and revenge are made explicit in the dialogue, the shot composition, the use of lighting and color. The meaning of the film is rather transparent, and for that reason I chose it as the first of the semester.
So when a student of mine from last semester emailed me to get my take on The Dark Knight, I started thinking about how I would teach this new film. It couldn't be the first film we'd study, that much is clear. Here's an excerpt of what I sent back to him (WARNING: HERE THERE BE SPOILERS):
I have a lot more thoughts on the movie, but I'd like to get other people's takes. Do you think The Dark Knight it deserve its current IMDB rating as #1 moving of all time?
I do agree with one review I've read which says that The Dark Knight is not an action or superhero movie but actually a horror film. In a lot of ways, that's true. The Joker's talent for chaos is unsettling - his actions are truly unpredictable, and this poses a problem not just for Batman but for the audience, as well. The movie doesn't fit any formula we as movie-goers are used to, and that's inherently disturbing, as is the Joker's willingness to attack us at our most vulnerable points. There are certain places (hospitals among them) that would seem off-limits to most villains, but that's not true in this instance. These are techniques you'd be much more likely to find in a horror film than in one of the Spiderman movies.
I did notice some thematic similarities between Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, notably that idea of duality, but also self-myth-building. Bruce Wayne consciously constructs himself as a symbol in the first of the two films, and in The Dark Knight, the villains get to take a stab at building their own mythologies. The Joker, of course, as an agent of chaos, constantly changes his backstory, never explaining his scars the same way twice. Harvey Dent builds himself up as a hero and a martyr, but rewrites his story after his disfiguring accident: he rejects skin grafts and surgery so that he can better conform to the name "Two-Face," a moniker that Gordon and the other officers gave him long before that.
6 comments:
I liked The Dark Knight, and I really only usually go to this kind of movie because I have a house-full of men (sons and a fiance). Though I admit I dated a comic-book-loving guy for 3 years in college, and we would spend afternoons lying in bed reading them. That said, I'm not a horror movie fan, and though unpredictable, I liked the more grown-up psychological approach to the story and characters. Like the two ferries that had the ability to blow each other up.
I agree about the ferry scene being particularly tense (in a good way). I'm not sure I have as much faith in human beings as Christopher Nolan does, though - I definitely expected a different outcome.
I'm not sure that I agree with The People on the Internet that it is the number one movie of all time. That said, I did really enjoy it. I thought that the Joker was especially scary because he was appearing on the screen from beyond the grave (the late Heath Ledger.)
Honestly they should have just titled the movie "The Joker". Every scene with the Joker and Batman in it, Heath completely stole the show. As he should, The Joker wouldn't take second stage to anyone.
It's true, Heath Ledger really did steal the show. He made Christian Bale's Batman voice seem amateurish when it was actually a pretty great performance - far above any of the previous Batman movies. It's just... yeah, Ledger was incredible. He would have outshone anyone in that film.
I will agree that I'm not sure if I would call it BEST OF ALL TIME. That's too hard for my little brain to pick, but that said... it was a fucking amazing film.
Rhys and I have taken to describing the Nolan Batmans as crime dramas more than superhero movies, but I am interested in your comparison of TDK to horror films. The character of the Joker was amazing, and then ridiculously acted by Ledger. I hate people saying if he gets an Oscar it will only be because he died. Um, no. If he gets an Oscar it is because he was unreal in that movie; you had no idea it was HIM. Plus you can tell that it was a character meant to return because his fate at the end of the film is unclear. That is a bummer.
I will close this marathon of a comment by saying that the BIGGEST disappointment of the Nolan films is Bale's ridiculous voice as Batman. I get that he is trying to distinguish himself from Bruce Wayne, but... c'mon. It is the most cartoonish feature of the films, and annoys me every time I hear it.
Nobody likes his Dirty Harry impression? Aww c'mon give the guy a break. It's hard enough for the guy to sound like an American.
Post a Comment